Well, Of course exercise helps you to lose weight, right? When someone wants to lose weight, they’re inevitably told to do two things – change their diet and exercise more.
I’ve always wondered about the exercise part though. Not because I don’t think people shouldn’t exercise. I definitely think everyone should engage in some form of daily exercise, due to the many different health benefits they accrue. I just don’t necessarily think people will lose weight. This is for two reasons. Firstly, when you exercise, your appetite increases, so you eat more. Secondly, when you exercise, you generally increase your muscle mass, and muscle weighs about twice as much as fat.
Anyway, I decided to look at the evidence, and see whether people can reasonably expect to lose weight if they exercise more, or whether they should be focusing more on the diet aspect, if weight loss is their primary goal. The reason I think this is an interesting topic is because many overweight people have trouble losing the excess weight, and I think part of that is often due to an excessive focus on exercise, while not paying as much attention to the diet side of the equation.
There has actually been a ton of research on this topic, which makes it hard to be systematic and look at everything that’s been done. Instead I’ve tried to find a selection of the most relevant reviews, and focus on them.
In 2001, a meta-analysis was published in JAMA (The Journal of the American Medical Association) looking at the ability of exercise to achieve weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes. 14 controlled trials were included in the analysis (of which 11 were randomized), with a total of 368 participants. The average age of the participants was 55 years old.
Twelve of the trials looked at aerobic exercise, while two looked at resistance training. Only exercise interventions lasting at least eight weeks were included (which is reasonable, since I would think that is a bare minimum to see any meaningful difference in body composition). The interventions mostly consisted of three exercise sessions per week, with each session lasting roughly one hour, and the average length of the intervention periods was 18 weeks. The aerobic exercise interventions were of moderate intensity and generally took the form of walking or cycling. The resistance training exercises consisted of two to three sets, with 10 to 20 repetitions per set. Participants had an average starting weight of 82 kg (180 pounds).
Results? Participants in the exercise group weighed 0,9 kg (2 pounds) less at the end of the intervention periods, while participants in the control group weighed 0,8 kg (1,8 pounds) more. This was a small 1,7 kg difference in favour of exercise, but it wasn’t statistically significant.
I draw two conclusions from these results. First of all, these people were only marginally overweight to begin with. So, apart from the fact that people had to have type two diabetes to be included in these studies, which limits the ability to generalize to a broader population, they were also not that overweight, and certainly weren’t obese. This means that any conclusions drawn from this study don’t necessarily apply to people who are more seriously overweight. It is possible that more overweight people see more weight loss with exercise than less overweight people. Secondly, there was a trend toward weight loss with exercise even though it wasn’t statistically significant. Since weight gain and weight loss are generally slow processes, it’s possible that people who exercise more do see a big difference over the long term, say a decade or two, even though there isn’t really any noticeable difference at the 18 week mark.
Next we’ll look at a systematic review that was published in the International Journal of Obesity in 2005. The review included 6 randomized controlled trials, with a total of 514 participants, and the intervention periods ranged from 10 weeks to 52 weeks. One thing that was interesting about this review was that it only included studies that did a follow up after at least one year, to see if any weight loss that was achieved during the interventions was maintained over the slightly longer term.
The average weight of the participants at the start of the trials was 97 kg (214 pounds), which I think makes this study more important than the previous one. An average height adult that weighs 97 kg is obese (or a moderately successful body builder).
This study wasn’t comparing exercise with nothing, but rather exercise and diet modification with diet modification alone, which is just something to be aware of before we get in to the results.
At the end of the intervention periods, people in the “exercise + diet” group had lost 13 kg (29 pounds) while people in the “diet without exercise” group had lost 10 kg (22 pounds). At the end of the full year (when many people had presumably returned to old habits), the difference was 6,7 kg (15 pounds) vs 4,5 kg (10 pounds). As in the previous review, none of these differences was statistically significant.
What can we conclude? Although the difference between the groups is not statistically significant, there is a small difference, and as with the previous review, it’s possible that a longer term intervention period, i.e. one where people were exercising for years rather than months, would show a statistically significant difference in weight. One interesting thing to note though, which is made clear by this study, is that the difference caused by dietary changes is much bigger than any difference caused by exercise. 77% of the weight lost was due to diet modification, while exercise contributed a paltry 23% .
We’re going to finish up with a Cochrane review that was published in 2006. It included a massive 41 randomized controlled trials, with a total of 3,476 participants. This sounds really good at first, until you realize that the 41 studies were all so different that these 3,476 people had to be analyzed in a large number of separate “buckets”, limiting the statistical power of the analyses.
The trials varied in length from 3 to 12 months. The interventions varied, with walking being most common (21 trials). Other interventions included bicycling, jogging, weight lifting, and group aerobics. Exercise frequency ranged from three to five sessions a week, and duration ranged from 10 minutes to 90 minutes, with an average of 40 to 50 minutes. Some of the trials compared exercise with no intervention, some compared exercise with diet modification, and a couple compared exercise + diet modification with just diet modification. All the trials required participants to have a BMI (Body Mass Index) of 25 or over (the definition of being overweight). Unfortunately the review doesn’t provide any more detail than that on how much the participants actually weighed.
Among the two studies (270 participants) that compared exercise with doing nothing, participants in the exercise group lost 2 kg (4,4 pounds) more than participants in the “do nothing” group. This result was statistically significant.
Among the 15 studies that compared exercise + diet modification with just diet modification (1,079 participants) the exercise + diet group lost an average of 0,65 kg (1,4 pounds) more than the group that just changed their diet. Again, the result was statistically significant. Whether it was relevant to the real world is more questionable, and I guess depends on whether the additional weight loss would have continued over the longer term with continued exercise.
So, what conclusions can we draw from all this? In the above reviews, weight loss varied from 0,65 to 3 kg (1,4 to 6,6 pounds) over the course of the interventions when the exercise groups were compared with the control groups. Considering that people who are overweight generally weigh over 80 kg (176 pounds), that is a pretty marginal difference, which isn’t going to be visibly noticeable. Additionally, that difference wasn’t statistically significant in most of the studied groups, and becomes even more questionable when you consider that very few of these trials were blinded, so people generally knew if they were in the intervention arm or the control arm, and therefore whether they were supposed to lose weight or not. This could of course result in a bigger apparent difference than would be seen in real life, since knowing that you are in the intervention group often makes people more motivated to prove that there will be an effect.
Admittedly, the intervention periods weren’t always that long, and a 2 kg difference over six months might mean a 20 kg difference over six years. If that is the case, then exercise does become an important factor over the long term.
One thing that is clear from the above reviews, however, is that changes in diet have a much bigger effect on weight than changes in exercise patterns, generally a three or four times bigger difference. My take-home from this is that people who want to lose weight should focus the main part of their energy on modifying their diet.
You might also want to look in to whether cutting down on salt is good for your health and whether you should be taking vitamin D supplements to decrease your risk of depression.
13 thoughts on “Is exercise an effective way to lose weight?”
I totally agree with your conclusion. Real weight loss can never be accomplished with exercise only. Me and my wife are both sugar and carb “addicts” and struggle with our “BMI’s”. I play tennis 5-6 days per week approx 2 hours per session and that way get my “6000-10000” steps in. This never changes my weight unless I really focus on limiting my daily calorie intake. Would say the tennis steps cut somewhere in the range of 200-300 calories. but that doesn’t do much good if I eat “2500” calories per day. And I have known this “fact” for some 30 years now…
Exercise is great for the overall well being, heart, and lung capacity and muscle strength but in my opinion, only makes up for approx 10%-15% of the weight loss…
My own belief is that you can’t outrun/walk/hop/skip a bad diet. The majority of people I play tennis with are overweight and tend to hit the carbs big time. Lots of exercise but the telltale ‘spare tyre’ is very evident. I am like a reed (61cm waist) even though I eat lots of eggs, meat, fish, cheese, butter, above ground vegetables and berries, twice a day to satiety but no bread, spuds, pasta, cakes, pizza … the list goes on.
P.s. I’m a bit ancient (78) but I’ve never felt better.
About diet and exercise.
Op do 27 aug. 2020 13:33 schreef Sebastian Rushworth M.D. :
> Sebastian Rushworth, M.D. posted: ” Well, Of course exercise helps you to > lose weight, right? When someone wants to lose weight, they’re inevitably > told to do two things – change their diet and exercise more. I’ve always > wondered about the exercise part though. Not because I don’t think” >
Can’t argue with the science but there are two factors which I believe also contribute to weight maintenance or loss. The first is that while you’re exercising you’re not eating. If you’re walking, cycling or anything else that takes a big chunk of the day for that period you’re calorie input is zero. The other is the mood changing value of exercise. Most people experience an emotional lift from a good walk, cycle ride or game of tennis. They are less likely to look for their satisfaction in the fridge or a bottle. I know that my friends who walk regularly aren’t necessarily skinny but no one will bust a gut carrying their coffins.
I won’t argue with the science but there are two factors not necessarily picked up by this study. The first is that during exercise you are unlikely to consume any calories. If you walk for a few hours that is hours not spent eating. The second is that exercise lifts people’s mood. If you get satisfaction from walking, cycling or tennis you’re less likely to seek it from your fridge or a bottle. I ramble and while there are people of differing builds in our groups no one will damage their backs carrying our coffins.
That’s interesting reading but I’d have to say my experience is different. On two occasions in my life I’ve let my weight creep up to unhealthy levels, reaching a maximum of 92.5 kg. On both occasions cycling has helped me bring it down again. On the second occasion I started cycling to work, eventually getting up to doing 8,000 km per year. Doing this, without going on a diet, I managed to shed almost 15kg. However, I also had to be aware that doing this was not a license to eat what I wanted. I found that if I started snacking on the (freely available) biscuits at work my weight loss would slow or stop.
In my case I think I would have struggled to change my diet sufficiently to lose that weight without the exercise so for me the exercise worked well. It also saved me a load of money as my train tickets into work were costing around £170 per month. Win win!
In reply to, quote “Firstly, when you exercise, your appetite increases, so you eat more. Secondly, when you exercise, you generally increase your muscle mass, and muscle weighs about twice as much as fat”,
In my experience, exercise tends to depress appetite and even though the increased muscle mass weighs more, it takes many more calories to maintain a BMR.
I hate exercise. At best, most weeks, I only manage to complete 10,000 steps in a day. If I go on a diet and my weight loss is stalled I will add in 3 x 20 minutes of aerobic exercise, which does seem to be enough to start me losing weight again, but it takes a couple of weeks before that happens.
Thank you very much for the interesting post. My BMI is around 21. So, I’m not really the fat guy. In April, I usually go hiking for 10 days on the island of Crete. That’s 10 days having 10-20 kgs on my back and living on a pretty simple mediterranean diet. I loose around 3 kgs or 4-5% of my total body weight. Would I call this an “excercise”? Not really. Would this be a practical approach for my everyday live? Of course not! However, it prooves a pretty simple rule of thumb: If you want to loose weight, eat less and burn more. Simple and effective. Is it comfortable? Absolutely not! This is probably the reason for so many diets and so many trials investigating it. But nothing can change the fact that you have to burn more calories than you consume to loose weight. Simple as that.
That’s my experience too. Also, ‘weight’ is the wrong thing to obsess about. Look in a mirror, measure your waist, make sure you don’t get too big for your current clothes. Cut out refined sugar.
Some comments I would have on this are that, looking at weight loss alone you are really not going to get very far. Whilst I would agree that moderate walking and cycling are likely to leave you hungry having burned off very little, there is no doubt that more intense exercise assists with appetite control (seems paradoxical but is true, from my experience plus other studies).
In addition intense exercise will over build muscle. As you say muscle weighs more than fat; I would submit that a physique with less abdominal fat and more muscle in thighs, glutes chest and arms is a significan tresult even if your weight remains the same.
I think that a major limitation on exercise and weight loss studies is that what needs to be measured is FAT loss, not weight loss. What is relevant to one’s health is body composition and fat distribution. I realize that we need some type of standardized weight to frame measurement, but BMI is merely a snapshot in conjunction with the broader health picture (sex, client background, body frame, RHR, cholesterol profile, BP, cardiovascular capacity, body measurements, etc.) Someone with a BMI of 23 with a small frame, very little skeletal muscle, and an excess of visceral fat would be at a higher risk of disease than a high performance female athlete with a BMI of 28, fat mainly distributed across her buttocks and hips, and 20% body fat. Since the only way to accurately measure body fat percentage is water displacement, many of these studies don’t address fat loss at all and of the ones which do, many older studies have used calipers or special scales, etc. Therefore, the information isn’t reliable which is frustrating. But these studies usually do look at other factors than merely weight and in this respect it is incontrovertible that exercise vastly improves people’s overall health profiles-whether or not they lose body fat doing it. That’s the takeaway. Moreover, since we know that exercise along with improved eating habits do help adherents to maintain a healthier body composition than merely eating well alone, and exercise helps people to stick to a healthier eating regimen, what is the disadvantage to emphasizing a combined approach for better results?
Although you might not loose much weight overall when exercising, you – depending on the exercise – could loose significant amounts of fat and gain muscle weight at the same time. Or in other words replace fat weight by muscle weight.
And whether health concern or asthetic concerns are the driver to loose weight, in both area loosing fat mass is more important than loosing total mass.
At least that is the way I look at it.